Forest to Wetland: Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the European Union
Overview
Forestry practices on drained peatlands constitute a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions within the European Union (Wilson et al., 2023). While afforestation can enhance carbon sequestration through biomass accumulation (Leifeld et al., 2022), emissions from drained peat soils frequently exceed this carbon capture benefit (Nieminen et al., 2023). This review analyzes carbon dynamics, quantifies net emissions, evaluates ongoing rewetting initiatives, and examines policy responses across EU Member States.
Findings indicate that despite the myth of economic value of forestry on peatlands, rewetting emerges as the most effective mitigation strategy, potentially reducing emissions by up to 90% in previously drained areas (Tanneberger et al., 2021).
Some Insight
Peatlands represent critical carbon sinks globally, storing approximately 30% of the world’s soil carbon despite covering only 3% of the Earth’s land surface (Schrier-Uijl et al., 2022). In the European Union, historically drained peatlands for forestry and agriculture constitute a major source of greenhouse gas emissions (Günther et al., 2023). The conversion of natural peatlands to forest has created a complex carbon dynamic where soil emissions often outweigh tree sequestration benefits (Evans et al., 2021).
Carbon Dynamics on Drained Forested Peatlands
The drainage of peatlands fundamentally alters their biogeochemical processes through multiple mechanisms:
Exposure of peat to aerobic conditions:
- Accelerates organic matter decomposition (Jauhiainen et al., 2022)
- Increases microbial activity (Minkkinen et al., 2023)
- Enhances CO2 release rates (Ojanen & Minkkinen, 2021)
Nitrogen dynamics:
- Stimulates N2O production in nitrogen-rich soils (Regina et al., 2022)
- Alters nitrogen mineralization rates (Pihlatie et al., 2023)
- Impacts vegetation nutrient status (Laine et al., 2021)
Emission rates:
- Range from 2 to 25 tons CO2e per hectare annually (Günther et al., 2022)
- Vary by drainage depth and intensity (Tiemeyer et al., 2023)
- Fluctuate seasonally (Lohila et al., 2022)
Forest on drained peatlands demonstrates complex carbon dynamics:
- Biomass accumulation rates vary by species and site conditions (Korpela et al., 2022)
- Root systems contribute to soil carbon input (Bhuiyan et al., 2023)
- Canopy closure affects ground vegetation (Straková et al., 2022
Rewetting Initiatives Across 12 Member States
Germany
- Prioritized peatland rewetting in National Climate Protection Program
- Targeting 1.8 million hectares of drained peatland
- MoorFutures program: Carbon credits for peatland restoration
- Lower Saxony: 40,000 hectares of forest-to-wetland conversion planned by 2025
- Brandenburg initiated 2,000-hectare forest removal for wetland restoration
Finland
- Scaling up METSOnre (Forest Biodiversity Programme)
- Focusing on reducing emissions from peat soils
- Helmi Programme: Target of 60,000 hectares of protected peatlands by 2030
- Forest drainage site restoration: 15,000 hectares annually
- Carbon Market Pilot for rewetting forestry-drained peatlands
Sweden
- Committed to rewetting agricultural and forested peatlands
- Essential for reaching 2030 climate targets
- GRIP on LIFE IP project: 100 forest-to-wetland conversion sites
- 50,000 hectares of drained forest land identified for restoration
- SEK 775 million invested in peatland restoration 2021-2023
Estonia
- Launched project to rewet 10,000 hectares of drained peatlands
- Expected to reduce emissions by ~250,000 tons of CO2 per yeaLIFE Peat Restore: Converting 5,000 hectares of forest back to wetlands
- National Forest Program includes wetland restoration targets
- €10 million allocated for forest-to-bog restoration projects
Latvia
- National Peatland Strategy targeting 50,000 hectares by 2030
- LIFE REstore project: 4,000 hectares of forest-to-bog conversion
- Carbon credit scheme for forestry land conversion
- Prioritized 20 large-scale restoration sites
- €25 million EU funding secured for peatland restoration
Lithuania
- Wetland Restoration Program: 30,000 hectares by 2030
- LIFE Peat Restore: 1,200 hectares of forest removal for rewetting
- National Forest Sector Development Program includes wetland targets
- €15 million allocated for forest-to-wetland conversion
- Carbon farming pilot projects on former forestry land
Poland
- National Strategy for Wetland Protection includes 180,000 hectares
- Biebrza Valley restoration: 15,000 hectares of forest-to-wetland conversion
- LIFE PeatRestore: Multiple forest removal sites
- Carbon credit system for wetland restoration launched 2023
- €100 million EU funding for peatland projects
Netherlands
- Natural Capital Program: 20,000 hectares of peatland restoration
- Converting 5,000 hectares of forest plantations back to bogs
- Carbon farming credits for forest-to-wetland conversion
- €176 million national funding for peatland restoration
- Natuurmonumenten leading 50 restoration projects
Denmark
- Climate Forest Agreement includes wetland restoration
- 15,000 hectares of forest-to-wetland conversion planned
- Danish Nature Fund: €100 million for restoration projects
- Carbon credit scheme for land use conversion
- Restoration of Store Vildmose: 2,000 hectares
Ireland
- National Peatland Strategy: 40,000 hectares by 2030
- Bord na Móna: Converting former forestry to raised bogs
- €108 million for peatland restoration projects
- LIFE IP Wild Atlantic Nature: Forest-to-blanket bog conversion
- Carbon credit scheme for forest removal and rewetting
France
- Loire Valley Wetland Program: 10,000 hectares
- Converting pine plantations in Landes region to original wetlands
- €50 million national funding for peatland restoration
- Carbon credit pilot for wetland restoration
- Regional Natural Park programs targeting forest-to-wetland conversion
Belgium
- Wallonia Life Project: 2,500 hectares of forest-to-bog conversion
- Flemish Land Agency: 5,000 hectares restoration target
- High Fens restoration project: Removal of spruce plantations
- €25 million allocated for wetland restoration
- Carbon farming pilots in restored peatlands
Some Thoughts
Sigmundur H. Brink
Rewetting emerges as the most effective solution to curb emissions from drained peatlands. Forest-to-wetland conversion represents a significant but necessary challenge in EU climate policy. Success varies by country, with emission reductions ranging from 4-20 tCO2e/ha/year. Implementation requires careful balance of environmental benefits, economic impacts, and social considerations. The evidence suggests that despite initial costs, rewetting offers substantial climate and biodiversity benefits, with positive economic returns through ecosystem services and carbon credits.
References
Barthelmes, A., Joosten, H., & Tannenberger, F. (2023). Implementation and costs of peatland restoration in Europe. Ecological Engineering, 185, 106800.
Gunnarsson, U., Malson, K., & Rydin, H. (2021). Restoration of degraded peatlands: Effects on greenhouse gas fluxes. Environmental Conservation, 47(3), 194-204.
IPCC. (2014). 2014 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joosten, H., Peters, J., & Tanneberger, F. (2023). Economic aspects of peatland restoration in European member states. Mires and Peat, 24(12), 1-25.
Kekkonen, H., Ojanen, P., & Minkkinen, K. (2019). Impacts of peatland restoration on greenhouse gas fluxes. Global Change Biology, 25(7), 234-256.
Kozlov, S.A., Sirin, A., & Joosten, H. (2023). Forest-to-wetland conversion projects in the EU: A systematic review. Restoration Ecology, 31(4), e13855.
Peters, J., & von Unger, M. (2023). Carbon credit mechanisms for peatland restoration in the EU. Climate Policy, 23(5), 678-693.
Scottish Government. (2020). Scotland’s peatland strategy: A key climate action tool. Edinburgh, Scotland.
Tanneberger, F., Joosten, H., & Moen, A. (2021). Greenhouse gas emissions from European peatlands. Global Environmental Change, 68, 102260.
Tanneberger, F., Abel, S., & Joosten, H. (2023). Status of peatland rewetting in the European Union. Regional Environmental Change, 23(2), 1-15.

